Lumbar disc herniation. A comparison of the results of chemonucleolysis and open discectomy after ten years.
نویسندگان
چکیده
Using data obtained by questionnaire in a retrospective review of patients with low-back and sciatic pain (eighty-five treated by injection of chymopapain and seventy-one, by open discectomy), the results at one and ten years after treatment were analyzed. For this analysis we used six measures of pain relief, six measures of the patients' course during the ten-year period since primary treatment, and four measures of the patients' history of employment or work since initial treatment. Validity studies demonstrated that the pain-outcome measures reflected the patients' condition adequately and that all six measures were significantly related to each other (Pearson's r, p less than 0.003). The chymopapain and discectomy groups were not distinguishable on the basis of the pain-outcome measures. However, body mass was directly related to the presence of pain ten years after discectomy but not after injection of chymopapain. Analysis of the progress measures (indicators of the course of the patients' pain during the ten-year period) showed that the rates of reoperation in the two treatment groups did not differ significantly, but the discectomy patients tended to have had a higher rate of reoperation at both one and ten years after initial treatment. These measures did not show unequivocal superiority of one treatment compared with the other. Using the work measures (assessments of the patients' history of employment since initial treatment), it was found that in both treatment groups the patients who returned to work six to twelve weeks after treatment despite persistent symptoms had significantly more pain at ten years (p less than 0.04). Also, the patients who returned to work less than six weeks after treatment, while still symptomatic, showed a similar trend. On the other hand, among the patients who were still symptomatic at twelve weeks, it made no difference in the final results whether they returned to work at twelve weeks or thereafter. These findings support the notion that after either discectomy or chemonucleolysis, patients should return to work only after complete symptomatic recovery or a minimum convalescence of twelve weeks.
منابع مشابه
Chemonucleolysis versus surgical discectomy for sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation. A cost and quality-of-life evaluation.
The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the cost and effects on quality of life [using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs)] of 2 treatments for sciatica secondary to lumbar disc herniation: chemonucleolysis and surgical discectomy. The design involved a combination of decision analysis and Rosser index, with assessment of probabilities from long term clinical series. Utility was...
متن کاملLower thoracic disc herniation mimicking lower lumbar disk disease: A case report
Thoracic disk herniation comprises 0.15% of all disk herniation and has various and confusing manifestations. Among them, radicular pain down the leg could be the rarest presentation, especially if it is the only complaint. On the other hand, finding the relationship between clinical and paraclinical needs require high index of suspension and it is demanding. A 34-year-old patient, who ha...
متن کاملFunctionality Status and Surgical Outcome of Fenestration versus Laminotomy Discectomy in Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation
Background & Aim: To assess functionality status and surgical outcome of fenestration versus laminotomy technique based on Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) in patients with lumbar disc hernia (LDH). Methods & Materials/Patients: A cross-sectional study was performed between January 2007 and April 2012. A total of 108 patients with a single-level disc herniation were asked to respond to the...
متن کاملComparison of 7 Surgical Interventions for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Network Meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND The number of interventions on intervertebral discs rapidly increased and the treatment options for lumbar disc surgery quickly evolved. It is important that the safety and efficacy of all new innovative procedures be compared with currently accepted forms of treatment; however, the previous pairwise meta-analyses could not develop the hierarchy of these treatments. OBJECTIVES The ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
دوره 68 1 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1986